Mediacoder x64 difference between subtitle modes password#
If someone says, "I'm using bcrypt", then they are using both a password hash and unique per-password salts, or they're not using bcrypt. I haven't followed the space too closely for 3-4 years, I'm not sure if bcrypt/blowfish is still the recommended algorithm or there's newer better onesīut both you & GGP are talking about bcrypt as though it was only a password hash.
![mediacoder x64 difference between subtitle modes mediacoder x64 difference between subtitle modes](https://androidas.ru/assets/9ad-MediaCoder1-545x979.jpg)
Good luck to those who changed their email in 15 years though. This would be useful for moving from sha256 => bcrypt, since collisions on sha256 are not practical, but if the original hash was md5 then I think it's fine to delete the md5 passwords and require a new one. A common technique is not to delete old passwords, but instead to rehash them with the new algorithm. This is a slow hashing method, meaning anyone trying to rainbow-table attack your passwords will have a hard time. `password_hash` should be used instead of `hash_hmac`, with the algorithm being "PASSWORD_BCRYPT" or better. At least with salt+pepper it limits attack surface, but instead you should be hashing your passwords with: sha256 is not the proper way to store passwords, it's still vulnerable to the same attack as md5, rainbow tables, because it's a FAST algorithm (sure md5 is also poor for collisions, meaning it's worse, but practical attacks for lists of hashed passwords are rainbow tables). Wait, what? Definitely lesson not learned: > user passwords are saved in safe form using hash_hmac and sha256 algo with salt and pepper, all md5() passwords are deleted That reason is because breaches like this happen daily and these breaches are a threat both to the public IDs we use for emails and to the private passwords we use, should they be poorly secured. I'm sorry, but yes it is related as the operators of repositories like this (and there are others) are deaf to the reasons why users make use of these disposable mail domains. In fact, go visit the last comment in the PR I linked: a contributor points to a Hacker News comment for reasoning why operators might want to make use of this blocklist.
![mediacoder x64 difference between subtitle modes mediacoder x64 difference between subtitle modes](https://images.wondershare.com/videoconverter/en/mac/mediacoder.jpg)
![mediacoder x64 difference between subtitle modes mediacoder x64 difference between subtitle modes](https://windows-cdn.softpedia.com/screenshots/Windows-Portable-Applications-Portable-MediaCoder_4.png)
You're also welcome to peruse some of the PRs and issues in the repository if the README wasn't clear enough. This much is obvious by spending less than five seconds reading the README plastered on the front of repo. It's intended to be called as a Python library (hence the aforementioned PSF member tending it) by actors who want to prevent user registrations on their platforms by users of disposable email domains. It's not intended to be just a list of domains.